Yahooyahoo.com
Yahoo's API program has a strong foundation in discovery and design — partners and agents can find and parse your APIs reliably. However, two areas are holding back partner adoption at scale: Developer Experience (no self-service portal, no quickstart, and thin endpoint descriptions mean partners can't get to a first successful call without hand-holding) and Agent Usability (no runnable collection with test scripts and no idempotency documentation mean neither human developers nor AI agents can safely build and verify real workflows).
API DesignA clean, typed, well-governed API contract agents can reason about2 pass1 warn0 fail93A+
| Signal | Points | Findings | Rationale | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| warn | Schema coverage & depthvia sdk | 20.8/25 | 1 of 4 public signatures use loose types (anyTypeRatio=0.250). Investigated: sdk 83%. | Typed, complete request/response schemas are what make agent function-calling possible. |
| pass | Security & governance hygienevia wellknown | 15/15 | security.txt valid at https://yahoo.com/.well-known/security.txt (Contact + unexpired Expires). Investigated: wellknown 100%. | No leaked secrets, no critical lint violations, no OWASP API Top-10 spec smells, and a published vulnerability-disclosure channel. |
| pass | Example coveragevia docs | 10/10 | Code samples present on 2/20 pages across 2 language(s); broader multi-language coverage missing. Investigated: docs 100%, sdk 100%. | Examples carry shape semantics schemas under-specify — for humans and agents alike. |
| na | Machine-readable, versioned contract | —/25 | No surface produced evidence for this capability in this run. | A current OpenAPI version with a declared versioning scheme lets agents reason about the contract. |
| na | Auth declared & discoverable | —/25 | No surface produced evidence for this capability in this run. | Agents can only authenticate when auth is declared, scoped, and discoverable. |
Developer ExperienceThe context both developers and agents need to integrate fast — onboarding, code samples, complete descriptions and worked examples1 pass0 warn3 fail46F
| Signal | Points | Findings | Rationale | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pass | Code samples in docsvia docs | 18/18 | Code samples present on 2/20 pages across 2 language(s); broader multi-language coverage missing. Investigated: docs 100%. | Multi-language samples shorten time-to-first-call. |
| fail | Self-service developer portalvia docs | 0/29 | No signup page detected across conventional paths (/signup, /sign-up, /register, /get-started, /console/signup, /dashboard/signup, /try, /try-free, /free, /free-trial, /start, /start-free). Investigated: docs 0%. | Self-serve key/account creation is the fast first call for partners, with no sales gate. |
| fail | Quickstart presentvia docs | 0/25 | No quickstart/getting-started page found at the conventional paths. Investigated: docs 0%. | A quickstart is the fastest path from landing page to first successful call. |
| fail | Description completenessvia sdk | 0/15 | 3/3 operations lack a description. Investigated: sdk 0%. | Complete descriptions are the context humans and agents need to use endpoints. |
| na | Changelog published | —/13 | No surface produced evidence for this capability in this run. | A published changelog lets partners track changes without surprise. |
Agent DiscoveryPartners and their agents can find your APIs — llms.txt, registries, crawlable and reachable docs2 pass2 warn0 fail90A+
| Signal | Points | Findings | Rationale | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pass | Docs reachable, not hard auth-gatedvia docs | 30/30 | All 1 pages are publicly accessible. Investigated: docs 100%. | Agents can only index and fetch docs they can reach — past auth gates and over correct HTTP semantics. |
| pass | Registry & SDK presencevia sdk | 28/28 | Discovered SDKs in 5 distinct languages. Investigated: sdk 100%, docs 0%, cli 0%, mcp 0%, wellknown 0%. | Listing in MCP registries and publishing SDKs puts the API where agents and their tooling look. |
| warn | llms.txt present, valid & comprehensivevia docs | 25/30 | No /llms-full.txt found at the candidate origins. Investigated: docs 83%, sdk 0%. | A valid, comprehensive llms.txt is the machine-readable entry point for agents. |
| warn | Crawlable / AEOvia wellknown | 6/12 | No sitemap discoverable via robots.txt or /sitemap.xml on the docs host. Investigated: wellknown 50%. | Bots allowed plus a fresh sitemap make docs findable by agent crawlers. |
Agent UnderstandingAgents can correctly interpret your APIs — machine-readable errors, consistent descriptions, structured data, parseable docs1 pass0 warn2 fail64C
| Signal | Points | Findings | Rationale | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pass | Agent-navigable, token-efficient docsvia docs | 22/22 | All 1 pages contain server-rendered content. Investigated: docs 100%. | Server-rendered, clean, small-footprint docs are what an agent can cheaply fetch and parse correctly. |
| fail | Agent instructions file (AGENTS.md)via wellknown | 0/10 | No AGENTS.md at the site root or /.well-known/. Investigated: wellknown 0%. | An AGENTS.md gives coding agents explicit setup, auth, and usage instructions to interpret and operate the API — beyond llms.txt's link index. |
| fail | Docs structured datavia docs | 0/8 | Neither JSON-LD nor OpenGraph/meta tags detected across 1 assessed pages (1 JS-rendered). Investigated: docs 0%. | Structured data (JSON-LD/schema.org) on docs pages gives agents an unambiguous parse target and is what answer engines cite. Detected on the JS-rendered head (Firecrawl) for a bounded page budget, so JS-injected JSON-LD is now caught; pages we can't render are excluded rather than failed. |
| na | Machine-readable errors (RFC 9457) | —/28 | No surface produced evidence for this capability in this run. | RFC 9457 problem details and a documented error-code inventory let agents parse failures without burning tokens. |
| na | Operation purpose clarity | —/25 | No surface produced evidence for this capability in this run. | Agents select the right endpoint from its summary + operationId; clear, named operations make tool-selection reliable — the strongest driver of correct tool choice. |
| na | Description consistency across surfaces | —/7 | Only 1 surface description(s) with ≥6 tokens available; need at least 2 to compare. | Every surface tells the same story about what the product is. |
Agent UsabilityAgents have the context to use your APIs reliably, not just find them0 pass1 warn2 fail45F
| Signal | Points | Findings | Rationale | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| warn | Sandbox separationvia sdk | 10/20 | No test-mode flag or sandbox environment is exposed. Investigated: sdk 50%. | An isolated environment lets agents exercise destructive operations safely. |
| fail | Idempotency documentedvia sdk | 0/27 | No built-in retry machinery was found; transient failures are not retried. Investigated: sdk 0%. | Documented idempotency lets agents retry safely. |
| fail | Runnable collection with test scriptsvia platform | 0/9 | No public Postman workspace discovered for the org. Investigated: platform 0%. | A public, maintained collection with assertions is runnable truth agents validate against. |
| na | Rate-limit signaling | —/22 | No surface produced evidence for this capability in this run. | Machine-readable rate-limit headers let agents throttle adaptively. |
| na | Pagination documented & consistent | —/22 | No surface produced evidence for this capability in this run. | Consistent, documented pagination lets agents traverse collections. |