Mxmx.com
Mx's API discovery is a genuine strength — partners and agents can find your APIs without friction. However, the program has two critical gaps that will stall partner adoption: there is no self-service onboarding path (no portal, no quickstart, no code samples), meaning partners cannot get hands-on without a sales conversation, and agents lack the structured context — runnable examples, idempotency guidance, rate-limit signaling, and an agent instructions file — they need to integrate reliably without guessing.
API DesignA clean, typed, well-governed API contract agents can reason about5 pass0 warn0 fail100A+
| Signal | Points | Findings | Rationale | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pass | Machine-readable, versioned contractvia spec | 25/25 | API versioning documented in the docs site at https://docs.mx.com/api-reference/platform-api/overview/versioning. Investigated: spec 100%, docs 100%. | A current OpenAPI version with a declared versioning scheme lets agents reason about the contract. |
| pass | Schema coverage & depthvia sdk | 25/25 | Public surface is precisely typed (anyTypeRatio=0.000, 0/3 loose). Investigated: sdk 100%, spec 67%. | Typed, complete request/response schemas are what make agent function-calling possible. |
| pass | Auth declared & discoverablevia spec | 25/25 | Authentication required (global or on every operation). Investigated: spec 100%, docs 100%. | Agents can only authenticate when auth is declared, scoped, and discoverable. |
| pass | Security & governance hygienevia spec | 15/15 | No credential-shaped strings detected in spec. Investigated: spec 100%, wellknown 100%. | No leaked secrets, no critical lint violations, no OWASP API Top-10 spec smells, and a published vulnerability-disclosure channel. |
| pass | Example coveragevia spec | 10/10 | 30% example coverage. Investigated: spec 100%, sdk 50%, docs 0%. | Examples carry shape semantics schemas under-specify — for humans and agents alike. |
Developer ExperienceThe context both developers and agents need to integrate fast — onboarding, code samples, complete descriptions and worked examples2 pass0 warn3 fail49F
| Signal | Points | Findings | Rationale | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pass | Description completenessvia spec | 15/15 | 100% of operations + parameters have substantive descriptions. Investigated: spec 100%, sdk 0%. | Complete descriptions are the context humans and agents need to use endpoints. |
| pass | Changelog publishedvia spec | 13/13 | changelog documented in the docs site at https://docs.mx.com/release-notes. Investigated: spec 100%, docs 100%, sdk 100%. | A published changelog lets partners track changes without surprise. |
| fail | Self-service developer portalvia docs | 0/29 | No signup page detected across conventional paths (/signup, /sign-up, /register, /get-started, /console/signup, /dashboard/signup, /try, /try-free, /free, /free-trial, /start, /start-free). Investigated: docs 0%. | Self-serve key/account creation is the fast first call for partners, with no sales gate. |
| fail | Quickstart presentvia docs | 0/25 | No quickstart/getting-started page found at the conventional paths. Investigated: docs 0%. | A quickstart is the fastest path from landing page to first successful call. |
| fail | Code samples in docsvia docs | 0/18 | No detectable code samples across 20 sampled docs pages. Investigated: docs 0%. | Multi-language samples shorten time-to-first-call. |
Agent DiscoveryPartners and their agents can find your APIs — llms.txt, registries, crawlable and reachable docs3 pass1 warn0 fail95A+
| Signal | Points | Findings | Rationale | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pass | Docs reachable, not hard auth-gatedvia docs | 30/30 | All 50 sampled pages are publicly accessible. Investigated: docs 100%. | Agents can only index and fetch docs they can reach — past auth gates and over correct HTTP semantics. |
| pass | Registry & SDK presencevia docs | 28/28 | Indexed on Context7 (websites/mx, 6418 snippets). Investigated: docs 100%, cli 100%, sdk 92%, mcp 0%, wellknown 0%. | Listing in MCP registries and publishing SDKs puts the API where agents and their tooling look. |
| warn | llms.txt present, valid & comprehensivevia docs | 24.4/30 | llms.txt contains parseable links but doesn't fully follow the proposed structure: https://docs.mx.com/llms.txt: No blockquote summary found. Investigated: docs 81%, sdk 0%. | A valid, comprehensive llms.txt is the machine-readable entry point for agents. |
| pass | Crawlable / AEOvia wellknown | 12/12 | Docs paths crawlable by all monitored AI agents. Investigated: wellknown 100%. | Bots allowed plus a fresh sitemap make docs findable by agent crawlers. |
Agent UnderstandingAgents can correctly interpret your APIs — machine-readable errors, consistent descriptions, structured data, parseable docs1 pass4 warn1 fail59D
| Signal | Points | Findings | Rationale | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| warn | Agent-navigable, token-efficient docsvia docs | 18.3/22 | 2 of 50 pages have substantive content differences between markdown and HTML (avg 3% missing). Investigated: docs 83%. | Server-rendered, clean, small-footprint docs are what an agent can cheaply fetch and parse correctly. |
| warn | Operation purpose clarityvia spec | 15.6/25 | 0% of operations are agent-inferable. Investigated: spec 63%. | Agents select the right endpoint from its summary + operationId; clear, named operations make tool-selection reliable — the strongest driver of correct tool choice. |
| pass | Docs structured datavia docs | 8/8 | JSON-LD Article markup on 18/18 assessed pages (100%) with dateModified present. Investigated: docs 100%. | Structured data (JSON-LD/schema.org) on docs pages gives agents an unambiguous parse target and is what answer engines cite. Detected on the JS-rendered head (Firecrawl) for a bounded page budget, so JS-injected JSON-LD is now caught; pages we can't render are excluded rather than failed. |
| warn | Machine-readable errors (RFC 9457)via docs | 3.5/28 | No 4xx/5xx response codes (or default error response) documented anywhere in the spec. Investigated: docs 13%, spec 6%. | RFC 9457 problem details and a documented error-code inventory let agents parse failures without burning tokens. |
| warn | Description consistency across surfaces | 0.6/7 | Mean pairwise description similarity across 2 surfaces (spec, docs) is 3% (threshold 35% for full credit). | Every surface tells the same story about what the product is. |
| fail | Agent instructions file (AGENTS.md)via wellknown | 0/10 | No AGENTS.md at the site root or /.well-known/. Investigated: wellknown 0%. | An AGENTS.md gives coding agents explicit setup, auth, and usage instructions to interpret and operate the API — beyond llms.txt's link index. |
Agent UsabilityAgents have the context to use your APIs reliably, not just find them1 pass1 warn3 fail50D
| Signal | Points | Findings | Rationale | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pass | Sandbox separationvia sdk | 20/20 | Sandbox environments are exposed (sandbox). Investigated: sdk 100%, spec 0%, docs 0%. | An isolated environment lets agents exercise destructive operations safely. |
| warn | Pagination documented & consistentvia docs | 11/22 | 1 list endpoint(s) exist but no pagination params found. Investigated: docs 50%, spec 38%. | Consistent, documented pagination lets agents traverse collections. |
| fail | Idempotency documentedvia spec | 0/27 | 0% of mutating operations document idempotency. Investigated: spec 0%, docs 0%, sdk 0%. | Documented idempotency lets agents retry safely. |
| fail | Rate-limit signalingvia spec | 0/22 | No rate-limit response headers documented. Investigated: spec 0%, docs 0%. | Machine-readable rate-limit headers let agents throttle adaptively. |
| fail | Runnable collection with test scriptsvia platform | 0/9 | No public Postman workspace discovered for the org. Investigated: platform 0%. | A public, maintained collection with assertions is runnable truth agents validate against. |
Resources Discovered
The public resources we found for Mx — the evidence behind the score. All discovered from public sources; nothing here requires access to your systems.
| Agent hints | Context7 (6,418) |
|---|---|
| APIs analyzed | 4 — Platform API 2026, Rewards, Consent Management V4 API, OpenAPI Plant Store |